* initial cmake implementation
* ci: i guess older cmake doesn't support this
* cmake: add max version to suppress warning
Co-authored-by: Anonymous Maarten <madebr@users.noreply.github.com>
---------
Co-authored-by: Anonymous Maarten <madebr@users.noreply.github.com>
* Stubbed a bunch of classes and annotated them for later use. Heavily wip and more of pseudocode right now.
* Converted pseudocode into real code!
* Created a bunch more classes and added more information to exisiting ones
Did not error check, this was pushed just for reference
* More classes and implementation details. Still not checked for any errors
* Fixed code and decided on a way to handle virtual table stubs
* Some additional fixes
* More smaller fixes
* Added classes to project and made it compile
* Fixed function adresses that caused the python script to fail
* More classes and virtual function resolves. Builds and compares fine.
* Again more classes and virtual function resolves. Builds and compares fine.
* No clue, I guess forced update for line endings
* Finished up some work, compiles fine. All functions are STUB annotated to not pollute reccmp.py output.
* line ending change
* rename GetClassName/IsClass
Mirroring recent changes from master
* further conform to current master
* update project
* cleanup
* project only updates when you close msdev
---------
Co-authored-by: Cydra <cydra95@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: itsmattkc <34096995+itsmattkc@users.noreply.github.com>
Followed the hint from @madebr in #31 that the next function in MxString was operator+. The one after that is operator+= and both are at 100%.
Squashed commits:
* Removed unnecessary consts
* Replaced malloc/free with new/delete, which solved swapped regs in operator=
* Use delete[] when freeing char* m_data
Was intended as a simple code improvement, however it also seems to make WinMain, MxString::operator=, MxDSFile::Open 100% (all of which just needed registers to be switched around)
* match WinProc
* minor accuracy improvement
* WndProc at 50%
* fix WM_DISPLAYCHANGE branching
* fix type
* fix x/y comparison
* WndProc 82%
* 84%
* 97%
* rearrange functions to get close to the original
* remove newline
* inline no longer necessary
* merge
* 100% Match of MxDSFile
* ...almost, MxDSFile::Open is still not quite matching but all of the
other methods are 100% matching.
* Turns out that most of the virtual methods and some of the members are
actually on the MxDSSource base class, which I've pulled out as part
of this.
* In order to implement the methods I added the MXIOINFO class, which
seems to be a thin wrapper around the MMIOINFO windows structure. We
can tell this because MMIOINFO::~MMIOINFO was included in the DLL
exports, and calls down to a function which deconstructs something
looking exactly like MMIOINFO.
* Add mxdssource.cpp
* mattkc feedback
* some accuracy improvements
* Use FOURCC macro
* Tirival solve in mxioinfo.cpp
* Update mxdsfile.cpp
0xFFFFFFFF -> -1
---------
Co-authored-by: Christian Semmler <mail@csemmler.com>
* Improve reccmp.py
* Now only shows the info for a single function when a specific function
is specified via -v
* Now colors the output by default
* Percentages are shown as green/yellow/red depending on the percentage
completed.
* Diff +/- lines are shown as green/red.
* Includes standard --no-color argument in case we need no color for
some tooling which consumes the output.
* Feedback
* Use bitfield for MxVideoParamFlags
Using a bitfield for MxVideoParamFlags results in the same xor/and logic that was partially inlined in the header file. This approach is a lot cleaner and there's a good chance this is what the devs would have landed on.
The code generation is really finicky -- other inlines in the header influence the code just by being there -- so I decided to stub out all of them. This got the match to 100%.
While I was in isle.cpp::SetupVideoFlags, I changed the signature so that the `m_using16bit` parameter is just `using16bit`.
* fix: cast Set16Bit inline arg to byte
We've confirmed that, despite a function being declared inline, msvc will still make a conventional call in some circumstances. As such, I feel like this is warranted because it's most likely what a developer would have actually written.
