Evelyn Eastmond 52519ae1e0 Add comment.		2019-05-17 11:28:51 -04:00
..
blocks	Add a button to the CoreEx extension	2019-04-02 23:13:01 -07:00
dispatch	Apply suggestions from code review	2019-03-25 16:32:51 -04:00
engine	Merge pull request #1648 from mzgoddard/stop-all-next-tick	2019-05-15 11:25:15 -04:00
extension-support	Merge pull request #2061 from knandersen/boostextension	2019-04-03 19:05:37 -04:00
extensions	Add comment.	2019-05-17 11:28:51 -04:00
import	turn getCanvas into a class CanvasPool	2019-03-06 10:53:15 -05:00
io	Merge pull request #1943 from ktbee/clock-timer-compat-fix	2019-03-29 13:01:28 -04:00
playground	benchmark load now	2019-02-22 16:01:09 -05:00
serialization	start loading sb3 assets before handling sb3 data	2019-03-12 17:16:13 -04:00
sprites	Update src/sprites/sprite.js	2019-04-10 08:55:54 -04:00
util	It seems like there's a tradeoff between how we choose to set the max power of the motors. Previously, I had set the motors' max power (torque) to follow their target speed, meaning they accelerated smoothly, but also lost their torque. Then in the following commit I changed the max power to 100 which means maximum torque to achieve the target speed, which resulted in very abrupt accelerations and erratic motor movement when changing speeds:	2019-04-08 17:56:54 -04:00
.eslintrc.js
index.js	Cleanup	2017-09-06 00:57:03 -06:00
virtual-machine.js	Merge pull request #2041 from ktbee/use-empty-bitmap-size	2019-04-16 14:50:42 -04:00