mirror of
https://github.com/codeninjasllc/discourse.git
synced 2024-12-11 00:02:05 -05:00
3e50313fdc
Since rspec-rails 3, the default installation creates two helper files: * `spec_helper.rb` * `rails_helper.rb` `spec_helper.rb` is intended as a way of running specs that do not require Rails, whereas `rails_helper.rb` loads Rails (as Discourse's current `spec_helper.rb` does). For more information: https://www.relishapp.com/rspec/rspec-rails/docs/upgrade#default-helper-files In this commit, I've simply replaced all instances of `spec_helper` with `rails_helper`, and renamed the original `spec_helper.rb`. This brings the Discourse project closer to the standard usage of RSpec in a Rails app. At present, every spec relies on loading Rails, but there are likely many that don't need to. In a future pull request, I hope to introduce a separate, minimal `spec_helper.rb` which can be used in tests which don't rely on Rails.
58 lines
2.2 KiB
Ruby
58 lines
2.2 KiB
Ruby
require 'rails_helper'
|
|
|
|
describe CategoryFeaturedTopic do
|
|
|
|
it { is_expected.to belong_to :category }
|
|
it { is_expected.to belong_to :topic }
|
|
|
|
context 'feature_topics_for' do
|
|
let(:user) { Fabricate(:user) }
|
|
let(:category) { Fabricate(:category) }
|
|
let!(:category_post) { PostCreator.create(user, raw: "I put this post in the category", title: "categorize THIS", category: category.id) }
|
|
|
|
it "should feature topics for a secure category" do
|
|
|
|
# so much dancing, I am thinking fixures make sense here.
|
|
user.change_trust_level!(TrustLevel[1])
|
|
|
|
category.set_permissions(:trust_level_1 => :full)
|
|
category.save
|
|
|
|
_uncategorized_post = PostCreator.create(user, raw: "this is my new post 123 post", title: "hello world")
|
|
|
|
CategoryFeaturedTopic.feature_topics_for(category)
|
|
expect(CategoryFeaturedTopic.count).to be(1)
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
it 'should not include invisible topics' do
|
|
invisible_post = PostCreator.create(user, raw: "Don't look at this post because it's awful.", title: "not visible to anyone", category: category.id)
|
|
invisible_post.topic.update_status('visible', false, Fabricate(:admin))
|
|
CategoryFeaturedTopic.feature_topics_for(category)
|
|
expect(CategoryFeaturedTopic.count).to be(1)
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
|
|
it 'should feature stuff in the correct order' do
|
|
SiteSetting.stubs(:category_featured_topics).returns(2)
|
|
|
|
category = Fabricate(:category)
|
|
t5 = Fabricate(:topic, category_id: category.id, bumped_at: 12.minutes.ago)
|
|
t4 = Fabricate(:topic, category_id: category.id, bumped_at: 10.minutes.ago)
|
|
t3 = Fabricate(:topic, category_id: category.id, bumped_at: 7.minutes.ago)
|
|
t2 = Fabricate(:topic, category_id: category.id, bumped_at: 4.minutes.ago)
|
|
t1 = Fabricate(:topic, category_id: category.id, bumped_at: 5.minutes.ago)
|
|
pinned = Fabricate(:topic, category_id: category.id, pinned_at: 10.minutes.ago, bumped_at: 10.minutes.ago)
|
|
|
|
CategoryFeaturedTopic.feature_topics_for(category)
|
|
|
|
# Should find more than we need: pinned topics first, then category_featured_topics * 2
|
|
expect(
|
|
CategoryFeaturedTopic.where(category_id: category.id).pluck(:topic_id)
|
|
).to eq([pinned.id, t2.id, t1.id, t3.id, t4.id])
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|